Skip to main content

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for Thomas Square to something that would accommodate “whatever purposes it needs as long as that purpose is a public purpose.”

From the livestream of 7/5/16 public informational meeting. Speaker is Guy Kaulukukui, the City's Director of the Department of Enterprise Services which will take over Thomas Square in February 2017 according to the City's Master Plan. Click here to download a copy of Kaulukukui's memo to the head of the State's Land and Natural Resources requesting a change in the purpose of Thomas Square

2. They could charge a fee like all other Enterprise Services venues, and that will stop some park users from continuing their use of the park. Why would they change it from a freely accessible public park? The mission of the city’s Enterprise Services is to be financially self-sustaining. None of the other facilities it operates is free to the public. All charge a fee. How will the costs for the modification and maintenance of Thomas Square be covered without commercialization and fees to the public?

The mission statement of the Department of Enterprise Services requires them to be financially self-sustaining. Here come big permit fees, private vendors, and prohibitions from bringing in what they vend. Just like the Waikiki Shell (also under DES)

3. It will lead to vendors and privatization. Requiring Thomas Square to be self-sustaining opens the door to privatization and commercial vendors. Mayor Kirk Caldwell himself has spoken of putting in a coffee shop and bicycle rentals. And as we shall see below, creation of new rules is completely within the authority of the Department of Enterprise Services without any interference from citizens or their elected officials.

4. They can ban coolers, food and beverages the way they now do for the Waikiki Shell in order to direct revenue to private concessions.

5. New rules and policies will exclude some current park users. At the July 5 informational meeting Kaulukukui said, “Certainly our purpose is to continue all the permitted uses as well as many of the community uses that go on in there right now” [emphasis added]. Not all of the community uses but “many.” That means some of the community uses will be prohibited, and those will no doubt be the ones that do not generate revenue for the city, like family picnics and other public gatherings.

6. No one wants the changes to begin with. There have been no groups of supporters for the Thomas Square Master Plan at any of the informational meetings. The public has not requested these changes and the changes are not needed to accommodate the public’s needs. At the informational meetings, many regular park users showed up to express concern. No one came to support the plan or claim that it was responsive to their needs or requests.

A number of these troubling questions are documented here. From the livestream of the 7/5/16 public information meeting.

7. There is no community oversight for the proposed changes. Other than informational hearings, there have been no “hearings” which require a decision-making body to take and record testimony and render a decision regarding the myriad changes the City proposes. There is no way for public comment to be documented, no public comment web page, no email address, no postal address for public comments to be made or viewed by the public. Discussions conducted at the Neighborhood Board level were completely ignored.

8. New rules replacing Parks and Recreations ordinances may be created without public oversight. As control of Thomas Square moves from the Department of Parks and Recreation to the Department of Enterprise Services, parks ordinances may be replaced by rules created solely by Enterprise Services and not subject to any public or political authority, save the will of the mayor. These rule changes are subject to a process where they must hold an informational meeting, but decision making is completely up to the department. No elected official or entity has any authority other than the mayor, who is the originator of the plan to begin with.

In case you missed it above, once again (from the livestream meeting of 5/31/16) Guy Kaulukukui, Director of the Department of Enterprise Services describes their rule making process: they make the rules, but they can't push them through if there's "significant amount of discord over the rules." Hence, this article.

With its Thomas Square Master Plan, the city takes Thomas Square from the public and hands it over to private commercial interests.

The park closure date, Aug. 15, is two days after the primary election, which may decide the next mayor of Honolulu. The handover to the Department of Enterprise Services is scheduled for February 2017, after the winning mayoral candidate takes office.

Tell Mayor Caldwell to keep Thomas Square a free public park! Thomas Square belongs to the community. It isn’t property the city can sell to the highest bidder!

PS The playlist of full recorded livestreams (usually long and boring) and excerpts is here.

H. Doug Matsuoka
15 July 2016
Alewa, Honolulu

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eric Seitz: Pro bono is a crock

At yesterday's "Justice in Jeopardy, Expanding Access to Justice in Challenging Economic Times" at the UH Richardson Law School, Dean of Harvard Law School Martha L. Minow pointed out that one in five Americans now qualify for civil legal assistance because they are within 125% of the Poverty Level -- a record high in the history in the county. As the demand for legal services grows, the available resources continue to diminish, leaving most without the "equal protection" of the law.

I checked out the breakout session on pro bono because I used to work for Hawaii's pro bono referral service, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii (VLSH).

These days, most pro bono services are not attorneys representing clients, but short informational sessions at legal clinics. Moderator Robert LeClair asked attorney Eric Seitz what he thought of this turn in pro bono services.  This is what Eric said:

"Well, let me start out by saying that I've always thought pro bono w…

HCDA creates their own anti-homeless police at HAR hearing

While no one was watching, the HCDA (Hawaiʻi Community Development Authority) held  a Hawaii Administrative Rules hearing that creates their own anti-homeless police force, and (incidentally) raises park fees by up to 500%. The affected parks are at the intersection of Honolulu Council Districts 4, 5, and 6, (Trevor Ozawa, Ann Kobayashi, and Carol Fukunaga respectively) but none (or their staff) were present today. These laws were made without any oversight from the public or their elected representatives.

Who knew that such sweeping changes could be made without the oversight of any elected officials? And after one decision making hearing that is accountable to no one? If the Honolulu City Council had to rule on such changes, it would require three full council hearings, and opportunities for public participation at each.

My own interest in attending the hearing was to get some kind of hint as to the mechanism the City would use to curtail First Amendment rights in Thomas Square afte…