Skip to main content

Dancing for dollars: Mayor Caldwell fast tracks bill for $57,600 in contributions?

[Update: I testified before the Honolulu City Council using the information in this post. Of course, it didn't make a difference to the outcome, but for the record, here's the video:


In my last post, I wondered how public outcry can have so little effect against Mayor Caldwell's attempts to criminalize the homeless, namely Bills 42, 43, and variants. This latest set of proposed ordinances has seen four hearings where hours and hours of testimony opposing the measures have been offered by all sorts of people: the young and old, haole and Kanaka Maoli, activists, attorneys, clergy, social workers, homeless and former homeless, etc. Yet the mayor's bills criminalizing sitting or lying on the sidewalk have marched through without much opposition from the Council.  And all this despite the fact that the mayor has been unable to present facts supporting the need for the bill or evidence of the efficacy of these sorts of "sit/lie" bills.

On June 12, Mayor Caldwell transmitted Bills 42 and 43 to the City Council who immediately scheduled a special hearing to fast track it through the three council hearings required to transform it into law. After the City's Housing Director Jun Yang and Managing Director Ember Shinn were unable to respond with any substantial information about when their rumored Housing First solution would go online, the Council had no choice but to defer the measures (Full video of Council Hearing of July 24: http://youtu.be/nz1Y5QMrEMg ).

But Rasputin and other bad things often don't stay dead, and the bills were resurrected. And again I asked, why does this happen?

Well, I figured it out. I looked over the list of people submitting testimony supporting the Mayor's criminalization bills and decided to check the names and corporations (tourist industry all) against a database of contributors to local politics.

Those submitting testimony supporting the Mayor's criminalization bills contributed $57,600 to him. That's just for the supporters and the corporations they list, and NOT family members or PACs not directly associated with the corporations or individuals.

These guys are big spenders. In recent years they have contributed to State and County (not including Fed) candidates a total of $703,158. I haven't traced how much of this has gone to councilmembers. Yet.

Here's the bottom line of the spreadsheet:
[Supporters sending in written testimony have contributed $57,600 to Mayor Caldwell, and $703,158 to State and County candidates. Click here for XL sheet and supporting worksheets listing each contribution.]
This goes beyond "pay to play" into the "dancing for dollars" territory. So yeah, I'll be at tomorrow's third and final hearing to testify against these bills criminalizing the homeless, but I don't expect to get much play. It's like walking into a pole dancing joint without any dollars. Right?

I'm sorry it has come down to this. We each need to light a torch (and sharpen a pitchfork) against this sort of "government."

H. Doug Matsuoka
9 September 2014
Makiki, Honolulu

The complete spreadsheet as well as individual spreadsheets listing each contribution by each named entity can be downloaded here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/lw8k942wilmte4n/AAC3nsM7X40BjtkL-xeyWaMPa?dl=0

The data comes from the Hawaii Campaign Spending Commission via Hawaii State Governments data portal: https://data.hawaii.gov/Community/Campaign-Contributions-Received-By-Hawaii-State-an/jexd-xbcg

The contribution dataset is updated as the Commission receives data. The set I downloaded is available on request.

Here's a link to the Council's Agenda for 9/10/14. There are links to the texts of Bills 42 and 43, and their variants, Bills 45 and 46.

You can add your voice against these bills. You can register to testify or submit written testimony at this link: http://www.honolulu.gov/ccl-testimony-form.html

Comments

  1. Another name to add to the list is Irongate (aka PACREP), the developer of the Trump condotel in Waikiki and the 2121 & 2139 Kuhio project (the Ritz-Carlton Residences Waikiki). Principals Casey Federman, Greg Brandes, Jason Grosfeld, his father James, mother Nancy, and wife(?) Jenna have contributed a combined $24,000 to Caldwell in this election cycle (and $8,500 in the previous election cycle).

    ReplyDelete
  2. ... and their donations to all candidates in this election cycle total $70,450.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mahalo for the info, Ben. In this particular example, I was only tracing money from those who were on the Council's record as submitting supporting testimony. As you point out, other "players" are out there and exerting their influence in ways contrary to the public good.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for…

For Dad on Father's Day

Neuroscientists now tell us that memory is a creative and plastic artifact subject to our own willful and inadvertent influence, the most powerful of which, I think, is the compulsion to understand things as coherent narratives.  But judging from what I hear from friends, associates, and regular ol' people on the street, most people's parent-narratives are about as plausible as their religious ones.  We keep our fathers and "Our Father's" in tiny little self-serving boxes.  And come to think of it, I guess most of us keep our own selves in some tiny boxes too.  Not saying this is good or bad or whatever.

Eric Seitz: Pro bono is a crock

At yesterday's "Justice in Jeopardy, Expanding Access to Justice in Challenging Economic Times" at the UH Richardson Law School, Dean of Harvard Law School Martha L. Minow pointed out that one in five Americans now qualify for civil legal assistance because they are within 125% of the Poverty Level -- a record high in the history in the county. As the demand for legal services grows, the available resources continue to diminish, leaving most without the "equal protection" of the law.

I checked out the breakout session on pro bono because I used to work for Hawaii's pro bono referral service, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii (VLSH).

These days, most pro bono services are not attorneys representing clients, but short informational sessions at legal clinics. Moderator Robert LeClair asked attorney Eric Seitz what he thought of this turn in pro bono services.  This is what Eric said:

"Well, let me start out by saying that I've always thought pro bono w…