Skip to main content

Eric Seitz: Pro bono is a crock

At yesterday's "Justice in Jeopardy, Expanding Access to Justice in Challenging Economic Times" at the UH Richardson Law School, Dean of Harvard Law School Martha L. Minow pointed out that one in five Americans now qualify for civil legal assistance because they are within 125% of the Poverty Level -- a record high in the history in the county. As the demand for legal services grows, the available resources continue to diminish, leaving most without the "equal protection" of the law.

Senators David Y. Ige and Clayon Hee giving the legislative report

I checked out the breakout session on pro bono because I used to work for Hawaii's pro bono referral service, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii (VLSH).

These days, most pro bono services are not attorneys representing clients, but short informational sessions at legal clinics. Moderator Robert LeClair asked attorney Eric Seitz what he thought of this turn in pro bono services.  This is what Eric said:

"Well, let me start out by saying that I've always thought pro bono was a crock. I think it's basically been a concept where rich people have salved their consciences by doing a little bit of work and thinking that they're really making a dent in the problem of providing needed legal services for people who can't otherwise get them. I'd much rather see the big firms -- if they're going to do that -- give money to legal services programs, give money to the people who do that work well, and who need more bodies, more lawyers, more people who do it on a full time basis. "

Seitz went on to explain that two thirds of the work his firm does is pro bono supported by paying cases.  But he admitted, "That's kind of a unique model.  If you want to do that kind of work you can find a way to do that. But it's not going to make a dent in society and the needs that we've been talking about here to just donate a few hours a week or a few hours a month or 50 hours a year. It's got to be done on a much larger more comprehensive scale and basically what's got to be done is organize and marshal the resources in the most effective places, and those are the organizations that are already doing this well and just don't have the people, the lawyers to be able to expand their capacities. "

Yup. But when Seitz asked Minow (who is also Vice President of Legal Services Corporation) about the prospects of LSC restoring the kind of funding and leadership it had in the '70's that was so effective, the answer was a "not any day soon" kind of reality check.

So the weather report is continued civil inequality and unrest. Until those who can do something about it do something about it. Else it's going to be a runaway truck ride down Pali Highway in a rainstorm.

H. Doug Matsuoka
12 June 2012
Makiki, Honolulu


Popular posts from this blog

HCDA creates their own anti-homeless police at HAR hearing

While no one was watching, the HCDA (Hawaiʻi Community Development Authority) held  a Hawaii Administrative Rules hearing that creates their own anti-homeless police force, and (incidentally) raises park fees by up to 500%. The affected parks are at the intersection of Honolulu Council Districts 4, 5, and 6, (Trevor Ozawa, Ann Kobayashi, and Carol Fukunaga respectively) but none (or their staff) were present today. These laws were made without any oversight from the public or their elected representatives.

Who knew that such sweeping changes could be made without the oversight of any elected officials? And after one decision making hearing that is accountable to no one? If the Honolulu City Council had to rule on such changes, it would require three full council hearings, and opportunities for public participation at each.

My own interest in attending the hearing was to get some kind of hint as to the mechanism the City would use to curtail First Amendment rights in Thomas Square afte…

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for…