Skip to main content

Cost of Bill 54 enforcement (including extraordinary costs)?

[On March 20, 2012, I sent this to Honolulu City Councilmember Romy M. Cachola with cc to rest of the Honolulu City Council, Mayor Peter Carlisle, Director Wes Chun, and the members of the Makiki Neighborhood Board. The email was also published to much public comment by the Honolulu Civil Beat, and The Hawaii Independent. However, I have not received a single response from the addressees. I still want to know the costs to the public for the creation of homeless people and suppression of free speech and peaceable assembly. Doug]

To: Romy M. Cachola, Council Floor Leader

I am requesting through you a breakdown of the extraordinary costs incurred by the City & County of Honolulu for the enforcement of "Bill 54," also known as ordinance 11-029 ROH (Revised Ordinances of Honolulu as Amended). More than anything though, I am requesting the calculation of the main cost of Bill 54, the per person cost to the residents of Honolulu for the creation of each additional homeless citizen of the City.

Although I am a resident of Tulsi Gabbard's district, I am submitting the request through you because you have repeatedly requested the information from Mayor Carlisle  (your memoranda of November 21, 2011, and January 4, 2012). Your interest in saving taxpayer monies and keeping accurate record of costs can only be in the best interest of the community regardless of political party or affiliation.

Now almost three months in to Bill 54's implementation, it might be a good time to get a grip on the actual costs of enforcing the ordinance. The costs would have to include not only City personnel on their regular duties but for overtime costs incurred during raids on weekends and during the dead of night, as in the March 14, 3am raid.

(Photo from February 15, 2012, raid on Occupy Honolulu)

So, to itemize the costs, In addition to the eight itemized categories of costs you identified in CC313, the breakdown should include the following:
(1) Extraordinary personnel costs including overtime pay for Facilities Maintenance, Parks, and Police personnel on the weekend and 3am raids.

(2) Extraordinary fuel and maintenance costs of the trucks, cranes, backhoe (which has to be trailored in), and other heavy equipment. I do not believe the City factored in the current increase in fuel costs for the heavy equipment used in the Bill 54 raids.

(3) Extraordinary storage costs. Theoretically, the seized property can be recovered by the owner at the Halawa storage area. But recovery of tents has been thwarted by the destruction of tents on seizure, and the requirement that only credit card receipts (no receipts for cash) are acceptable, and that the claimant must have been inside the tent during the seizure. (These requirements are from Wes Chun, Director of Facilities Maintenance Department). This leaves a large pool of destroyed and unclaimed possessions that must be stored or put up for public auction. Or perhaps, just destroyed. This procedure ensures very few tents or other belongings are actually reclaimed and subjects the City to legal challenges; but see (5) below.

(4) Criminalization costs. One of the greatest costs may be hard to calculate, but an attempt would be prudent and perhaps even a necessary due process consideration for elected officials. At the Makiki Neighborhood Board meeting of March 15, 2012, the representative from the Honolulu Police Department was asked if he had noticed a decrease in the homeless population of the area.

[From the live stream of the Makiki Neighborhood Board mtg 3/15/12]

His answer was that, "I haven't actually noticed an increase or decrease. It's pretty steady as far as the people we encounter." He further added his observation that, "Homeless are transient so they'll be in one area a couple of months. Police in that area will ask them to leave, and the police in that area they go to will ask them to leave, and they'll come back to where they started." Bill 54 seizes all the earthly belongings from homeless people and sets them out on the street in a state of material desperation. Does the ordinance force them into criminal acts? What is the material and human cost of forcing criminality on the homeless?

(5) Cost of inevitable litigation. During the hearings on the bill, the ACLU testified that the ordinance was subject to potentially expensive legal challenge. Although the ordinance was signed off by law professor Jon Van Dyke, he has since passed away. At the Makiki Neighborhood Board meeting on March 15, 2012, Board member Philip Hauret told members of Occupy Honolulu to "quit complaining and just sue the City." Legal action seems an inevitable consequence to what seems to be illegal seizures (seizure of items not stored for 24 hours on public property) and violations of the Kanawai Mamalahoe, the Law of the Splintered Paddle which guarantees those lying by the roadside be undisturbed. Videos made by Occupy Honolulu and others show clear violations of First and Fourth Amendment guarantees. I find it regrettable that although Occupy Honolulu will be able to mount legal challenges, most homeless people cannot because they lack the digital media and internet distribution network of Occupy Honolulu, or an awareness of and access to the legal system. The treatment of the homeless must be even more brutal but it can only be a matter of time before they acquire the recording and distribution technology to mount a legal challenge against the City.

(6) Cost of creating homeless people. This last item is not so much a cost category than a simple analysis using the figures from the answers above:

Number of people who have tents seized
- Number of people who recover tents
- Number of people placed in shelters
= Number of people without any kind of shelter

Of the hundreds of people who have had tents seized, only a few have been placed in shelters. The rest are just homeless people without tents or personal possessions who have been set out on the streets.

Further, if you divide the total costs by the  above number of people rendered truly homeless by Bill 54, you will arrive at the amount of money spent by the City to create each new homeless person under Bill 54.

Even if the purpose of Bill 54 were to create homelessness there would be a more economical way of doing that. As it is, Bill 54 is an egregiously wasteful cash sinkhole for taxpayer dollars. Regardless of your political outlook, using taxpayer dollars and City personnel to create homeless people, break the law,  and violate Constitutional rights is foolhardy and just plain wrong.

I join you in your requests for the cost breakdowns and look forward to seeing them.

Me ke ha‘aha‘a,

Hiroshi D. Matsuoka


Popular posts from this blog

Love, Truth, and Action: John Kelly's 3 requirements for activists

[I found this essay, originally published in 1997 and simply titled, "Save Our Surf" at Hawaiian Sovereignty activist Dennis "Bumpy" Kanahele's Hawaii-Nation website. I have retitled it and added headings and illustrations. All illustrations are from the University of Hawaii's digital collection of Kelly's pamphlets, posters, and photos. The are from protests and demonstrations dating back to the 1960's. 

Kelly's Save Our Surf (SOS) group started in the late 1960's in an effort to protect surfing and fishing sites that were being threatened by corporate development. Not only was SOS successful in those efforts, it helped create legislation protecting our natural resources, and was behind the creation of the first inventory of the public use of Hawaii's shoreline on all islands. — H. Doug Matsuoka]

Love, Truth, and Action
by John Kelly

One often hears dismay over differences among the various [Hawaiian] sovereignty movements today. We belie…

How I stopped worrying and learned to love the bomb

I think my boss at work (a Honolulu nonprofit) is a littled miffed at me. When the incoming ballistic missile warning came in over everyone’s phone this morning, she texted that she had just had training on this and for us to, “stay indoors, preferably on the floor away from windows.” I texted back that I was going to post, “still time to donate” on our website.
I live in a wooden house with windows facing Honolulu International Airport, Hickam Air Force Base, and Pearl Harbor. Given even a sub-megaton airburst at several thousand feet, and that the fatalities from atomic weapons come from the flash, not the blast (the flash of nuclear energy and not the explosive force), I’d be a memory before my body could experience any misgivings about the situation.
My boss is a quarter century younger than I am and lacks the dubious benefit of having lived through the Cold War with the Soviet Union (check history books for those guys). The American national doctrine against nuclear war with the…

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for…