Skip to main content

Repeal Bill 54


[Subscribers to the Honolulu Star Advertiser can read the Guest Editorial version of this originally published on Sunday, February 12, 2012. I present it here for those who can't get past the Advertiser pay wall. Doug]
The enduring symbol of the Kanawai Mamalahoe, the Law of the Splintered paddle tagged by police.  
Like most people, I would like to live in a clean, quiet, peaceful, and prosperous community. But at some point after the 2008 Crash, the homeless and their encampments began to expand into new parks, sidewalks, beaches -- even under freeway overpasses. I was surprised to see the "traditional" homeless spots so overcrowded, and even more surprised to see large encampments sprout all over the island.


The burgeoning homeless population camping on the streets made many in the community uncomfortable -- as it should. But people felt too small and powerless to address the causes of this sudden rise in homelessness and instead appealed to their local politicians to do something  to "clean up" the homeless, to put them out of sight, out of uncomfortable public awareness.

The result was Bill 54 (that became 11-29 Revised Ordinances of Honolulu). This ordinance allows for the seizure of attended personal property (such as tents and sleeping bags) "stored" on public property such as sidewalks. But of course, the ordinance has nothing to do with storage of property at all. It's simply a device to further criminalize homelessness. It takes, or threatens to take, all the worldly possessions of those who have the least.

Protester at the November 17, 2011 hearing on Bill 54. The overwhelming testimony against the bill predicted its use against the homeless and free speech. The City Council denied that would be the case. They also denied the ordinance would create additional costs for the City. To date, the ordinance has ONLY been used against the homeless and Occupy Honolulu.
The reason the homeless are so conspicuous in the first place is that the only place they can legally take shelter is "by the roadside" as that is protected by the Kanawai Mamalahoe, the Law of the Splintered Paddle enshrined in the State Constitution. City ordinances will not allow them to take shelter within parks or any other public place other than designated shelters.

The goal of the Occupy Movement (that began as Occupy Wall Street) is to address the inequitable distribution of wealth and the influence of corporations in government and society. In short, to hold those who caused the Crash (and the growth of homelessness) accountable for criminal acts. The urban encampments of the movement are new, unfamiliar, and disturbing to some people in the community. As many are aware, the Honolulu encampment has been subject to attempts at Bill 54 enforcement. While homelessness and protest are further criminalized, the real criminals -- Wall Street and its global partners -- have not been called into account.

I would like to be able to blame Tulsi Gabbard and the Honolulu City Council for this shortsighted, ineffective, expensive, and repressive ordinance. But Bill 54 was created in response to public pressure, so ultimately, I must appeal to the community.

"Mic Check" on Bill 54 and homelessness at the 2/2/12 Bill 54 Raid on Occupy Honolulu:

It is my fellow citizens I must remind that the only peaceful community we can hope for is one that is just. We must stop harassing the homeless, the victims of the crimes of the super-rich. We should vigorously support the creation and maintenance of public forums in public places. Allow Occupy Honolulu to maintain its encampment as a public forum to build support for bringing the real criminals to justice.

After the first day of trial, Megan Brooker was asked if police harassment has had a "chilling effect" on Occupy Honolulu.


Justice ensures the peace, and it has always come only after long and arduous struggle. You can't simply make laws to simulate its appearance. No justice, no peace. Repeal Bill 54.

H. Doug Matsuoka
4 February 2012
Makiki (Honolulu Council District 6), Honolulu

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HCDA creates their own anti-homeless police at HAR hearing

While no one was watching, the HCDA (Hawaiʻi Community Development Authority) held  a Hawaii Administrative Rules hearing that creates their own anti-homeless police force, and (incidentally) raises park fees by up to 500%. The affected parks are at the intersection of Honolulu Council Districts 4, 5, and 6, (Trevor Ozawa, Ann Kobayashi, and Carol Fukunaga respectively) but none (or their staff) were present today. These laws were made without any oversight from the public or their elected representatives.

Who knew that such sweeping changes could be made without the oversight of any elected officials? And after one decision making hearing that is accountable to no one? If the Honolulu City Council had to rule on such changes, it would require three full council hearings, and opportunities for public participation at each.

My own interest in attending the hearing was to get some kind of hint as to the mechanism the City would use to curtail First Amendment rights in Thomas Square afte…

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for…

Eric Seitz: Pro bono is a crock

At yesterday's "Justice in Jeopardy, Expanding Access to Justice in Challenging Economic Times" at the UH Richardson Law School, Dean of Harvard Law School Martha L. Minow pointed out that one in five Americans now qualify for civil legal assistance because they are within 125% of the Poverty Level -- a record high in the history in the county. As the demand for legal services grows, the available resources continue to diminish, leaving most without the "equal protection" of the law.

I checked out the breakout session on pro bono because I used to work for Hawaii's pro bono referral service, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii (VLSH).

These days, most pro bono services are not attorneys representing clients, but short informational sessions at legal clinics. Moderator Robert LeClair asked attorney Eric Seitz what he thought of this turn in pro bono services.  This is what Eric said:

"Well, let me start out by saying that I've always thought pro bono w…