Skip to main content

Email to Mayor Carlisle re raid of 2/15/2012 on Occupy Honolulu

Subject: Follow up on Kelsey Gaddy suggestion

Aloha Mayor Carlisle,
I'm writing to you at the suggestion of Kelsey Gaddy, your representative at last night's Makiki Neighborhood Board meeting which I attended along with several others from Occupy Honolulu. First, please extend my apologies to Ms. Gaddy for the longer than usual meeting. It was a packed agenda. Along with a pro-GMO presentation by registered Hawaii lobbyist for DuPont, Cindy Goldstein, a number of issues directly related to Occupy Honolulu came up for discussion.
One of the main concerns discussed was the "Bill 54" raid on Occupy Honolulu of 15 February 2012, in which Honolulu Police Department and City Parks personnel seized personal possessions on private property. These possessions and property were not subject to Bill 54 (ordinance 11-029) since they were not tagged, not on public property, and had never been stored on public property for 24 hours. In short, City personnel took personal possessions from people on private property. 
I asked several City personnel what law empowered them to take private possessions from people on private property. I would have expected a straight answer from Director of Housing, attorney Trish Morikawa, who was your Deputy Prosecutor when you were Prosecuting Attorney of Honolulu. (It seems odd to me for a prosecutor to become Director of Housing but it does explain why the homeless are treated like criminals.) 
Here's a video of the raid to help you follow along what I'm talking about:

Ms. Gaddy told us that she couldn't name the law off the top of her head, but that it wasn't a City ordinance but at state law, and therefore findable using an internet search of the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS). However, the only reference to "found property" I found in the HRS was this note to the statutes: 

"A police inventory of lost and found property is a search."
The property was inventoried, so constituted a search. I'm thinking the search of personal property without a warrant violates the 4th Amendment guaranties against unreasonable search and seizure but I'm not an attorney and in any case, HPD and City Parks personnel seem to repeatedly violate the US and Hawaii Constitution without much of a problem.
Although informed that the property would be available to be reclaimed the next day, as of today, two days later, it has still not been released. Since this weekend is a long one because of Presidents' Day, at best at least 6 days will elapse before possessions can be retrieved. 
Another question: If this seizure of personal possessions on private property was not under Bill 54's ordinance 11-029, why are the notices posted by the possessions marked with that ordinance.
One final question: What subjects citizens to the seizure of personal possessions on private property? 
So, to summarize, I have three questions: (1) Under what statute was the raid conducted? and (2) if the raid was conducted under an ordinance other than 11-029, why do the notices state that they were? (3) What subjects citizens to seizure of personal possessions on private property?
H. Doug Matsuoka
17 February 2012
Makiki, Honolulu


  1. The raid on private property was retaliatory because HPD, Housing/Parks have been looking really bad on MS Media. Also Trisha appears to have been really upset over Occupy's Valentine's day card to her.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for…

HCDA creates their own anti-homeless police at HAR hearing

While no one was watching, the HCDA (Hawaiʻi Community Development Authority) held  a Hawaii Administrative Rules hearing that creates their own anti-homeless police force, and (incidentally) raises park fees by up to 500%. The affected parks are at the intersection of Honolulu Council Districts 4, 5, and 6, (Trevor Ozawa, Ann Kobayashi, and Carol Fukunaga respectively) but none (or their staff) were present today. These laws were made without any oversight from the public or their elected representatives.

Who knew that such sweeping changes could be made without the oversight of any elected officials? And after one decision making hearing that is accountable to no one? If the Honolulu City Council had to rule on such changes, it would require three full council hearings, and opportunities for public participation at each.

My own interest in attending the hearing was to get some kind of hint as to the mechanism the City would use to curtail First Amendment rights in Thomas Square afte…

Eric Seitz: Pro bono is a crock

At yesterday's "Justice in Jeopardy, Expanding Access to Justice in Challenging Economic Times" at the UH Richardson Law School, Dean of Harvard Law School Martha L. Minow pointed out that one in five Americans now qualify for civil legal assistance because they are within 125% of the Poverty Level -- a record high in the history in the county. As the demand for legal services grows, the available resources continue to diminish, leaving most without the "equal protection" of the law.

I checked out the breakout session on pro bono because I used to work for Hawaii's pro bono referral service, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii (VLSH).

These days, most pro bono services are not attorneys representing clients, but short informational sessions at legal clinics. Moderator Robert LeClair asked attorney Eric Seitz what he thought of this turn in pro bono services.  This is what Eric said:

"Well, let me start out by saying that I've always thought pro bono w…