Skip to main content

Competing GMO corporations sit at the same table in Hawaii

[Update for 2013: This was written for the 2012 Hawaii Legislative session and is still current except the President of the association listed here as Monsantoʻs Perlak was replaced by Syngentaʻs Pillipson.] 

While reviewing the testimony submitted in opposition to the mandatory labeling of GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) products in Honolulu City Council Resolution 11-339, I wasn’t surprised to see lobbyists for huge chemical corporations like Monsanto and Syngenta.  
I’m new at this and not familiar with the “players” so when I saw the name of the Hawaii Crop Improvement Association, I decided to take a look and find out what they were about. In their testimony in opposition to GMO labeling, they describe themselves as “a nonprofit trade association representing the seed industry in Hawaii.” How cool, right?
Wrong! I tried to find out more about them by researching their officers and directors.  Here’s a breakdown:

Fred Perlak
Monsanto (Hawaii Lobbyist)
Vice President
Laurie Goodwin
Syngenta Hawaii
John Anderson
(anyone have info?)
Alika Napier
DuPont subsidiary Pioneer Hi-Bred
David Gilliland
Mycogen Seeds (sells Monsanto "Roundup Ready" seeds)
Cindy Goldstein
DuPont subsidiary Pioneer Hi-Bred (Hawaii Lobbyist)
Adolph Helm
Dow Agro-Science
Kirby Kester
BASF Plant Science
Steve Lupkes
BASF Plant Science
Mark Phillipson
Syngenta Seeds
Mark Stoutemeyer
DuPont subsidiary Pioneer Hi-Bred
Alan Takemoto
Monsanto (Hawaii Lobbyist)

And the Executive Director of this group, Alicia Maluafiti? Sheʻs a registered State of Hawaii lobbyist.

The corporations represented listed in alphabetical order:
What we have is a who’s who of multinational GMO corporations.  As much as they try to represent themselves as “agricultural” companies, note that all of them are primarily chemical companies with a major portion of their sales in poisons such as herbicides and fungicides.
Wiki says, “Some of Syngenta's main competitors are: Monsanto, BASF, Dow AgroSciences, Bayer CropScience and DuPont.” Hey wait, all these competitors are sitting at the same table here in Hawaii. Isn’t that illegal?  It seems to me it should be, but what do I know.
Here’s my thinking: Corporations that make and sell poisons are going to develop crops that increase the sale of those poisons. 
GMO HAS GOT TO GO! Support mandatory GMO labeling in Resolution 11-339! Submit testimony and I'll see you on December 7, at Honolulu Hale!

H. Doug Matsuoka
Makiki, Honolulu
5 December 2011

If you need more information or haven’t yet submitted testimony, I’ve gathered some links in a previous DougNote blog entry: Let the people speak!
Update of 01/18/2012: If anyone would like to keep track of efforts to regulate or label GMO during the 2012 Hawaii legislature, join GMO-FREE OAHU on Facebook. It's a small group now but can be used for legislative updates, communication, and discussion.


  1. Wow. Great work. I assume you've sent this to your local newspaper.

  2. fantastic, great. thanks for sharing on gmo free kauai facebook page

  3. Thanks for informing the public as it is important that the people are aware. NO THANKS TO GMO. No thank you to Poisons for Profits...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HCDA creates their own anti-homeless police at HAR hearing

While no one was watching, the HCDA (Hawaiʻi Community Development Authority) held  a Hawaii Administrative Rules hearing that creates their own anti-homeless police force, and (incidentally) raises park fees by up to 500%. The affected parks are at the intersection of Honolulu Council Districts 4, 5, and 6, (Trevor Ozawa, Ann Kobayashi, and Carol Fukunaga respectively) but none (or their staff) were present today. These laws were made without any oversight from the public or their elected representatives.

Who knew that such sweeping changes could be made without the oversight of any elected officials? And after one decision making hearing that is accountable to no one? If the Honolulu City Council had to rule on such changes, it would require three full council hearings, and opportunities for public participation at each.

My own interest in attending the hearing was to get some kind of hint as to the mechanism the City would use to curtail First Amendment rights in Thomas Square afte…

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for…

Eric Seitz: Pro bono is a crock

At yesterday's "Justice in Jeopardy, Expanding Access to Justice in Challenging Economic Times" at the UH Richardson Law School, Dean of Harvard Law School Martha L. Minow pointed out that one in five Americans now qualify for civil legal assistance because they are within 125% of the Poverty Level -- a record high in the history in the county. As the demand for legal services grows, the available resources continue to diminish, leaving most without the "equal protection" of the law.

I checked out the breakout session on pro bono because I used to work for Hawaii's pro bono referral service, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii (VLSH).

These days, most pro bono services are not attorneys representing clients, but short informational sessions at legal clinics. Moderator Robert LeClair asked attorney Eric Seitz what he thought of this turn in pro bono services.  This is what Eric said:

"Well, let me start out by saying that I've always thought pro bono w…