Skip to main content

No On Bill 54: Quick links to Bill 54 info

[updated 11/22/11 10:43am]


Just some quick links here to information about Bill 54 that might be useful for the final hearing currently scheduled for December 7, 2011, at Honolulu Hale.  Comments follow the links (all of which are to pdf files).

Bill 54
Bill Status (scroll down for links to submitted testimony)
The rest of the testimony (if all the testimony is missing from above, it's here) Use the drop down menu to scroll to the last couple of pages.
Minutes of the first hearing on Bill 54 on October 5
City Council hearing video archive

Submit testimony by email (preferably include your registered voter name and address)
Online speaker registration (for Dec 7 hearing)

This is being written on November 21, so things may have moved since today.

For information and help call City Council at 768-5010.  Navigating through the City Council docushare system is difficult.  I had help from Allyson Hong, Senior Council Information Specialist 768-3822.

Here's the for and against written testimony tally so far:


Particularly interesting in light of Honolulu Corporation Counsel signing off on the constitutionality of the bill are letters from ACLU attorney Daniel Gluck who says the opposite, and that the City runs the risk of enacting an ordinance that may incur substantial expenses to defend.  He mentions successful law suits against other cities for similar ordinances.

Note that Councilmember Nestor Garcia is the only one to vote against Bill 54 on the grounds that the homeless would be the first ones targeted.  Garcia has voted against criminalization of homelessness before.  He is the only Councilmember to stand up for the homeless.

My own opinion is that Occupy Honolulu would probably be the first ones targeted.  Police officers were overheard saying that once Bill 54 passed, Occupy Honolulu encampment could be cleared out.

Some background articles from CivilBeat.com
Honolulu Homeless Target of Belongings Ban? (10/11/11)
Sidewalk Bill Advances Despite Occupy (11/17/11)


See you on December 7.  That should be an easy date to remember.

H. Doug Matsuoka
Makiki, Honolulu (OMG the 6th District)
21 November 2011

Comments

  1. Do you know what time and in what room the December 7th meeting will be?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know the time of hearing yet. Will post when I find out. I think they may schedule several bills for the day and take them one after the other.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ALERT BILL 54 HEARING IS MOVED TO 10 AM WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 6, 2011
    BE THEIR IN THE LOBBY FLOOR OF CITY HALE AT KING AND PUNCHBOWL TO DISCUSS WHATEVER ,
    CALL ME IF YOU NEED DIRECTIONS
    TELL EVERYONE TO COME THIS IS REAL IMPORTANT

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am the first anonymous. I think they meant dec 7 at 10am. That when it looks like these council meetings start.

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://www4.honolulu.gov/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-119359/120711%20Council%20Agenda.htm

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What The City Doesn’t Want You To Know About Thomas Square

[This article was originally published by CivilBeat on July 21, 2016. I'm reprinting it with video clips. Doug]

The City of Honolulu plans to close Thomas Square on Aug. 15 for six months and re-open it in February 2017 as something completely different, according to its master plan. Although city officials have unveiled grandiose plans concerning a drastic makeover, there are a number of troubling things they are trying to keep under cover:

1. It will no longer be a public park. The master plan calls for Thomas Square to be transferred from the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation, where it is a public park, to its Department of Enterprise Services. What is it? The department runs the Blaisdell Center, the Waikiki Shell, the zoo and the public golf courses. By way of a memo dated April 28 from the city’s enterprise chief Guy Kaulukukui to the state’s head of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the city asked the state to make changes to allow a change of purpose for…

HCDA creates their own anti-homeless police at HAR hearing

While no one was watching, the HCDA (Hawaiʻi Community Development Authority) held  a Hawaii Administrative Rules hearing that creates their own anti-homeless police force, and (incidentally) raises park fees by up to 500%. The affected parks are at the intersection of Honolulu Council Districts 4, 5, and 6, (Trevor Ozawa, Ann Kobayashi, and Carol Fukunaga respectively) but none (or their staff) were present today. These laws were made without any oversight from the public or their elected representatives.

Who knew that such sweeping changes could be made without the oversight of any elected officials? And after one decision making hearing that is accountable to no one? If the Honolulu City Council had to rule on such changes, it would require three full council hearings, and opportunities for public participation at each.

My own interest in attending the hearing was to get some kind of hint as to the mechanism the City would use to curtail First Amendment rights in Thomas Square afte…

Eric Seitz: Pro bono is a crock

At yesterday's "Justice in Jeopardy, Expanding Access to Justice in Challenging Economic Times" at the UH Richardson Law School, Dean of Harvard Law School Martha L. Minow pointed out that one in five Americans now qualify for civil legal assistance because they are within 125% of the Poverty Level -- a record high in the history in the county. As the demand for legal services grows, the available resources continue to diminish, leaving most without the "equal protection" of the law.

I checked out the breakout session on pro bono because I used to work for Hawaii's pro bono referral service, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii (VLSH).

These days, most pro bono services are not attorneys representing clients, but short informational sessions at legal clinics. Moderator Robert LeClair asked attorney Eric Seitz what he thought of this turn in pro bono services.  This is what Eric said:

"Well, let me start out by saying that I've always thought pro bono w…